Timothy Liljegren's latest scratch by the San Jose Sharks is generating controversy

As reported by Hockey Patrol, Henry Thrun entered the lineup and sparked discussions among fans about Timothy Liljegren's performance and potential.

Some Leafs fans used the benching as an opportunity to critique Dubas' data-driven management style.

However, the situation with Liljegren goes beyond simple analytics or talent evaluation.

Since being traded to San Jose Sharks earlier this season in a deal involving Matt Benning and draft picks, Liljegren has been viewed differently by Sharks fans.

While some Leafs supporters labeled him as a failure, many Sharks fans point out that he's far from the team's weakest link.

Other San Jose defenders like Mario Ferraro, Jan Rutta and former Leaf Cody Ceci, have faced sharper criticism since the beginning of the season.

Statistically, Liljegren has six points in 22 games which is modest but they outpace Rutta who has four points in 35 games and Ferraro who has six points in 35 games.

Cody Ceci leads the group with nine points but still falls into the category of replacement-level production.

The Sharks' defensive struggles have been evidenced by the league's worst goal differential (30) and second-worst goals allowed (126), which means frequent lineup experiments as the team searches for a winning combination.

The backlash against Dubas reflects show tensions within the hockey community, with some fans resisting the growing reliance on analytics in favor of traditional "eye test" evaluations.

Timothy Liljegren's benching is more about San Jose's efforts to optimize its struggling lineup and he has already returned to practice on the second pairing with Mario Ferraro, suggesting the scratch was part of ongoing experimentation rather than because he was not playing good.

For Timothy Liljegren, the situation reflects the challenges of adapting to a rebuilding team while maintaining individual performance.